Instant Watch and Download this movie. You will have immediate access to this and other 15000 movies. FLING.COM - World's Best Adult Personals for adult dating, search millions of adult personals from singles, couples, and swingers looking for fun, browse sexy photos.
Arizona Indian Casino SuperSite! Arizona has 25 Indian casinos owned by 16 tribes. Total annual gaming revenue from these casinos is estimated at $2 billion, which.
Radiocarbon 1. 4 dating of the Shroud of Turin. Lex And Terry Cougar Dating more. The Shroud of Turin (Turin Shroud), a linen cloth that tradition associates with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating, in an attempt to determine the relic's authenticity. In 1. 98. 8, scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of AD 1. Jesus. The development in the 1. Dinegar and physicist Harry E. Gove consulted numerous laboratories which were able at the time (1. The six labs that showed interest in performing the procedure fell into two categories, according to the method they utilised: Two used a proportional counter approach.
Four used accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Structure Research Laboratory, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; the University of Oxford, UK; University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA; ETH Z. However, a disagreement between the S. Tu. R. P. In the end, a compromise solution was reached with the so- called . Shredding the samples would not solve the problem, while making it much more difficult and wasteful to clean the samples properly. However, in a 1. 99.
Gove conceded that the . Shredding the samples would not solve the problem, while making it much more difficult and wasteful to clean the samples properly. Testore performed the weighting operations, while Riggi made the actual cut.
Also present were Cardinal Ballestrero, four priests, archdiocese spokesperson Luigi Gonella, photographers, a camera operator, Michael Tite of the British Museum and the labs' representatives. As a precautionary measure, a piece twice as big as the one required by the protocol was cut from the Shroud; it measured 8. A strip showing coloured filaments of uncertain origin was discarded. The other half was cut into three segments, and packaged for the labs in a separate room by Dr Tite and the archbishop. The lab representatives were not present at this packaging process, in accordance with the protocol. The labs were also each given three control samples (one more than originally intended), that were: a fragment of weave coming from an Egyptian burial, discovered in 1. A. D.; a piece of mummy bandage carbon- dated to 2.
A. D.; a sample of the cloak having belonged to Louis IX of France and preserved in Saint- Maximin, Var, France, which had a verifiable provenance and was woven between 1. May–September 1. 98. The official and complete report on the experiment was published in Nature. Colonetti', Turin, . Since the C1. 4 dating at least four articles have been published in scholarly sources contending that the samples used for the dating test may not have been representative of the whole shroud. Rogers took 3. 2 documented adhesive- tape samples from all areas of the shroud and associated textiles during the STURP process in 1. Luigi Gonella (Department of Physics, Turin.
Polytechnic University) on 1. October 1. 97. 9, which Gonellla told him were from the Raes sample. On 1. 2 December 2.
Rogers received samples of both warp and weft threads that Prof. Luigi Gonella claimed to have taken from the radiocarbon sample before it was distributed for dating.
The actual provenance of these threads is uncertain, as Gonella was not authorized to take or retain genuine shroud material. He stated that his analysis showed: . The main part of the shroud does not contain these materials. Based on this comparison Rogers concluded that the undocumented threads received from Gonella did not match the main body of the shroud, and that in his opinion: . It may not have taken us long to identify the strange material, but it was unique amongst the many and varied jobs we undertake.” .
She has rejected the theory of the . He also attended the actual dating process at the University of Arizona. Gove has written (in the respected scientific journal Radiocarbon) that: .
If so, the restoration would have had to be done with such incredible virtuosity as to render it microscopically indistinguishable from the real thing. Even modern so- called invisible weaving can readily be detected under a microscope, so this possibility seems unlikely. It seems very convincing that what was measured in the laboratories was genuine cloth from the shroud after it had been subjected to rigorous cleaning procedures. Probably no sample for carbon dating has ever been subjected to such scrupulously careful examination and treatment, nor perhaps ever will again. Atkinson wrote in a scientific paper that the statistical analysis of the raw dates obtained from the three laboratories for the radiocarbon test suggests the presence of contamination in some of the samples. They conclude that: .
They examined a portion of the radiocarbon sample that was left over from the section used by the University of Arizona in 1. Gloria F Ross Center for Tapestry Studies.
They viewed the fragment using a low magnification (~3. They found . They concluded that the radiocarbon dating had been performed on a sample of the original shroud material. The shroud’s official custodian, Archbishop Cesare Nosiglia of Turin, told Vatican Insider: . If you’re using old techniques in new ways, then you need to submit your approach to other scientists. He stated that: . A determination of the kinetics of vanillin loss suggest the shroud is between 1. Even allowing for errors in the measurements and assumptions about storage conditions, the cloth is unlikely to be as young as 8.
Others contend that repeated handling of this kind greatly increased the likelihood of contamination by bacteria and bacterial residue compared to the newly discovered archaeological specimens for which carbon- 1. Bacteria and associated residue (bacteria by- products and dead bacteria) carry additional carbon- 1. Rodger Sparks, a radiocarbon expert from New Zealand, had countered that an error of thirteen centuries stemming from bacterial contamination in the Middle Ages would have required a layer approximately doubling the sample weight. Pyrolysis- mass- spectrometry examination failed to detect any form of bioplastic polymer on fibers from either non- image or image areas of the shroud. Additionally, laser- microprobe Raman analysis at Instruments SA, Inc. He has however also acknowledged that the samples had been carefully cleaned with strong chemicals before testing. He inspected the Arizona sample material before it was cleaned, and determined that no such gross amount of contamination was present even before the cleaning commenced.
They concluded that the proposed carbon- enriching heat treatments were not capable of producing the claimed changes in the measured radiocarbon age of the linen, that the attacks by Kouznetsov et al. Jackson proposed to test if this were actually possible. He told the BBC that . The producer of the 2. David Rolfe, suggested that the quantity of carbon 1. Other similar theories include that candle smoke (rich in carbon dioxide) and the volatile carbon molecules produced during the two fires may have altered the carbon content of the cloth, rendering carbon- dating unreliable as a dating tool.
These initial tests show no significant reaction - even though the sensitivity of the measurements is sufficient to detect contamination that would offset the age by less than a single year. This is to be expected and essentially confirms why this sort of contamination has not been considered a serious issue before. He also added that there is as yet no direct evidence to suggest the original radiocarbon dates are not accurate.
Christen applied a strong statistical test to the radiocarbon data and concludes that the given age for the shroud is, from a statistical point of view, correct. E.; Donahue, D. J.; Gore, B.
H.; Hatheway, A. L.; Jull, A. T.; Linick, T. W.; Sercel, P. J.; Toolin, L. J.; Bronk, C.
R.; Hall, E. T.; Hedges, R. M.; Housley, R.; Law, I. A.; Perry, C.; Bonani, G.; Trumbore, S.; Woelfli, W.; Ambers, J. C.; Bowman, S. E.; Leese, M. N.; Tite, M. 3. 37 (6. Bibcode: 1. 98. 9Natur.
D. Retrieved 1. 2 April 2. Thermochimica Acta. Revue critique. Critical Review.
Revue d'Histoire Eccl. INIST: 2. 23. 41. Retrieved 1. 4 April 2. C1. 4. arch. ox. ac. March 2. 00. 8. Retrieved 1. February 2. 01. 4.
Radiocarbon. Get over it Tom Chivers in the Daily Telegraph 2. December 2. 01. 1^Harbottle, Garman; Heino, Walden (1. Archaeological Chemistry IV. Advances in Chemistry. ISBN 0- 8. 41. 2- 1. Applied Optics. 1. Bibcode: 1. 98. 0Ap.
Opt. 1. 9. 1. 90. J. PMID 2. 02. 21. Robert Patruno. E quel falso lenzuolo divent. La Repubblica, October 1.
Schafersman, S. 2. Power, B. A. 2. 0, 1. Jennings, P. 2. 3, 1.
Jennings, P. 1. 4, 1. Meachum, W. Shroud Spectrum International. Ottobre 1. 99. 0, pp. Haelst, R. 1- 2. 9.^Mechtilde Flury- Lemberg, esperta mondiale in tessuti appartenente alla Fondazione Abegg di Berna. In altre occasioni verr.
Sindone - Didattica delle Scienze, No. Aprile 1. 99. 0, pp. Prestipino, C. A.
Ottobre 1. 99. 0, pp. Anderson, I. 2. 2.^White, N. R., D. Phil Thesis, Oxford, 1. Van Oosterwyck- Gastuche, M.- C. Raloff, J. 2. 45.^ ab. Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin, Damon et al, Nature, Vol. February, 1. 98. 9,^Gove, H.
Bibcode: 1. 98. 8Natur. G. 3. 02.^Tite, M. Bibcode: 1. 98. 8Natur. T. PMID 3. 35. 75. Evidence for the Skewing of the C- 1.
Dating of the Shroud of Turin Due to Repairs.^Marino, J. Van Oosterwyck- Gastuche, M.- C.
Printemps 1. 99. 7, pp. Van Oosterwyck- Gastuche, M.- C.
Whanger, A. D. 2. Hedges, R. M.; Housley, R. A.; Ramsey, C. Bronk; Van Klinken, G. Archaeometry. 3. 6 (2): 3. Bibcode: 1. 99. 1Natur.
B. Sue; Marino, Joseph G. Chemistry Today. 2. INIST: 2. 05. 75. Thermochimica Acta. Revue critique. Crosilla, M. Thermochimica Acta.
Retrieved 2 January 2. Thermochimica Acta. The London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved 2. 01. 0- 1. Freer- Waters, Rachel A; Timothy Jull, A J (2. Radiocarbon. 5. 2 (4): 1. Get over it Tom Chivers in the Daily Telegraph 2.
Dec 2. 01. 1^Bennettsmith, Meredith (2. New Research Dates Relic To 1st Century, Time Of Jesus Christ. Huffingtonpost. com.